PTET: Pass-Through Entity Tax Workaround

Notice 2020-75 Federal Framework  •  36+ State Regimes  •  OBBBA Preserved PTET Despite $40K Cap  •  NY Irrevocable March 15 Election  •  California Mandatory June 15 Prepayment  •  Resident Credit vs Income Reduction Models
IRS Notice 2020-75; IRC §162; §164(b)(6); §1361(b)(1)(D) 36+ State PTET Statutes Updated 2026
← State & Compliance

Pass-Through Entity Tax (PTET) is the state-level workaround to the federal SALT deduction cap under IRC §164(b)(6). The TCJA capped individual SALT itemized deductions at $10,000 starting 2018, hammering owners of S-corporations and partnerships in high-tax states whose share of entity-level state income tax was now non-deductible on individual federal returns. Connecticut enacted the first PTET in 2018; on November 9, 2020, the IRS issued NOTICE 2020-75 explicitly blessing the workaround - confirming that state income taxes paid AT THE ENTITY LEVEL by a partnership or S-corporation are deductible by the ENTITY under §162, reducing flow-through income to owners and effectively shielding the state tax from the individual SALT cap. Since 2020, 36+ states plus New York City have enacted PTET regimes. The OBBBA (P.L. 119-21, July 4, 2025) PRESERVED PTET despite raising the federal SALT cap to $40,000 for 2025-2029 - earlier bill versions had threatened to limit PTET, but the final law made no PTET changes. Even with the $40K cap, PTET remains valuable: above the $500K MAGI phaseout, the cap reverts to the $10K floor, and high earners in high-tax states still benefit substantially from PTET. PTET mechanics vary dramatically by state: tax rates (typically matching the highest state rate), election timing (some require March 15 election BEFORE year-end financial results; others allow extensions through the 9th month), revocability (NY irrevocable annually; some states 3-year binding), payment timing (California demands $1,000 or 50% of prior year by June 15 with consequences for missing), and credit mechanics (some states give credit to owners; others reduce owner taxable income).

PTET in One Paragraph

How it works: Partnership or S-corp elects to pay state income tax at ENTITY level. Entity deducts the state tax as §162 business expense, reducing federal flow-through income to owners. Owners receive K-1 with reduced taxable income (state tax effectively shielded from federal cap). Owners receive state credit or reduced state income, eliminating double state taxation. Federal SALT cap §164(b)(6) does NOT apply because tax is paid by entity, not individual.

Federal blessing: IRS Notice 2020-75 (November 9, 2020) - PTET payments deductible at entity level under §162.

Why it still matters post-OBBBA: $40K SALT cap phases down to $10K floor at $600K MAGI. High earners still benefit from entity-level deduction bypassing the individual cap entirely.

Cost: Cash flow impact (entity pays now); state administrative complexity; owner-level credit mechanics vary; multi-state issues for nonresident owners.

The Federal Framework - Notice 2020-75

Notice 2020-75 ElementDetail
IssuedNovember 9, 2020
AuthorityTreasury and IRS - announced intent to propose regulations
HoldingState income tax paid by a partnership or S-corporation under a "specified income tax payment" regime is deductible by the entity under §162 in computing non-separately stated income or loss
Effect on ownersOwners' K-1 share of business income is REDUCED by the entity-level PTET payment (reduced income model) OR they receive a credit (credit model)
§164(b)(6) bypassBecause tax is paid by entity, not individual, the individual SALT cap does not limit the deduction
Specified income tax paymentNotice term for state income tax imposed on and paid by entity that is creditable or reduces income at owner level
Regulations statusProposed regulations promised but not yet issued as of 2026 - practitioners rely on Notice itself
OBBBA effectOBBBA did NOT modify Notice 2020-75 framework; PTET preserved

State PTET Landscape - 36+ Jurisdictions

State / JurisdictionPTET Structure (verify current rules)
New York StateElective; annual irrevocable; graduated rate 6.85%-10.9%; election by March 15; pending proposal to extend to September 15
New York CityElective for partnerships with all NYC resident partners or S-corps with all NYC resident shareholders; layered on top of NYS PTET
CaliforniaElective; 9.3% rate; extended through 2030; mandatory $1,000 or 50% of prior year tax due June 15; cure provision for 2026-2030 if June 15 missed; 5-year credit carryforward
ConnecticutConverted from MANDATORY to ELECTIVE in 2024; annual election with state return
MassachusettsElective; 5% rate (9% on millionaires above $1M income)
New JerseyElective; graduated rate 5.675%-10.9% (Business Alternative Income Tax)
IllinoisMade PERMANENT December 12, 2025 (was set to expire 1/1/2026); 4.95% rate
MichiganElective; extended deadline to last day of 9th month after year-end (e.g., 9/30/2026 for calendar 2025); 3-year binding election
PennsylvaniaNo PTET (notable absence; flat 3.07% state income tax)
OregonElective; rate up to 9.9%
VirginiaExtended sunset to 1/1/2027 (was 1/1/2026); pattern of annual extensions
MarylandElective; 8% rate generally
ArizonaElective; 2.5% flat rate
ColoradoElective; 4.4% rate
GeorgiaElective; 5.49% rate
MinnesotaElective; 9.85% top rate
North CarolinaElective
OklahomaElective; deadline extended to return due date including extensions (2024+); Form 586
Texas, Florida, Washington, Nevada, South Dakota, Wyoming, Tennessee, Alaska, New HampshireNO state income tax - PTET not applicable

The PTET Math - Worked Example

Worked Example - High-Earning NY S-Corp Owner Post-OBBBA

Facts: Robert is sole shareholder of NYS S-corporation. 2026 S-corp ordinary income before any state tax: $1,500,000. He is a NY resident. NYS top rate effectively 10.9%. NYC top rate 3.876%. Property taxes $20,000. Federal MFJ; total MAGI $1,800,000 (well above $500K SALT phaseout).

WITHOUT PTET:

S-corp ordinary income to owner: $1,500,000
Owner's NYS tax: $1,500,000 × ~10.9% = $163,500
Owner's NYC tax: $1,500,000 × 3.876% = $58,140
Total state-level income tax: $221,640
Plus property tax: $20,000
Total SALT: $241,640
Federal SALT deduction (post-OBBBA, phased to floor at $1.8M MAGI): $10,000
Lost federal deduction: $231,640
Federal tax cost of lost SALT (37% bracket): $231,640 × 37% = $85,707

WITH NYS PTET + NYC PTET election:

NYS PTET paid by entity: $1,500,000 × ~10.9% = $163,500
NYC PTET paid by entity: $1,500,000 × 3.876% = $58,140 (assuming all-resident shareholders eligibility)
Total entity-level state tax: $221,640
S-corp federal income to owner: $1,500,000 - $221,640 = $1,278,360 (reduced by PTET)
Federal tax savings from reduction in flow-through income: $221,640 × 37% = $82,007
Owner gets NYS credit for $163,500 PTET paid; NYC credit for $58,140; net state tax effectively the same
Owner's individual SALT cap still allows $10,000 federal deduction for property tax

Net federal tax savings from PTET: approximately $82,000 per year.

Election Mechanics - State-by-State Critical Deadlines

StateElection DeadlineRevocability
New York StateMarch 15 of tax year (e.g., March 15, 2026 for tax year 2026); pending proposal to extend to September 15Annual irrevocable once made
New York CityMust elect NYS PTET first to be eligibleAnnual
CaliforniaElection with timely filed return; mandatory June 15 prepayment of $1,000 or 50% of prior year; cure provision 2026-2030 for missed June 15 deadlineAnnual
Connecticut (post-2024 conversion)Annual with state returnAnnual
IllinoisAnnual; made permanent December 2025Annual
MichiganLast day of 9th month after year-end (e.g., 9/30/2026 for tax year 2025)3-year binding election
OklahomaReturn due date including extensions; Form 586 stand-alone availableAnnual
Most statesAnnual or 3-year binding; verify state-specific rulesVaries
The California June 15 Prepayment Trap: California PTET historically required mandatory $1,000 or 50% of prior year PTET by June 15 - and missing this deadline VOIDED the entire election for the year (no late-cure permitted). For tax years 2026-2030, California now allows entities to make valid elections even if the June 15 deadline is missed - but the 2025 election remains subject to the harsh rule. Verify each year's rules before relying on California PTET.

Resident Credit vs Income Reduction - Two PTET Models

State ModelOwner-Level Mechanic
Credit model (most states)Owner reports FULL share of business income (without PTET reduction) on state return; takes nonrefundable credit equal to share of PTET paid; carryforward of unused credit varies by state
Reduced income modelOwner's K-1 reflects reduced income (after PTET); no credit needed at state level
HybridSome states combine elements
NYS creditOwner receives credit; refundable to extent exceeds NYS individual tax (cap exists)
California credit9.3% credit; nonrefundable; 5-year carryforward
Resident's home state creditIf PTET paid to State A by entity, resident of State B may or may not get credit on B return - varies by state

Multi-State Issues - Nonresident Owners and Tiered Entities

Multi-State ScenarioTreatment
NYS S-corp with all-NY-resident shareholdersOptimal - both NYS PTET and NYC PTET available; full benefit
NYS S-corp with mix of NYS and non-NY resident shareholdersNYS PTET still elective but allocation issues; NYC PTET NOT available (requires all NYC residents)
Nonresident shareholder's share of PTETCredit varies - nonresident may get NYS credit; home state credit treatment uncertain
Tiered partnerships (upper-tier partnership owns lower-tier partnership)Each tier may need to elect PTET separately; flow-through complexity; Notice 2020-75 unclear on tiered structures
Investment partnership (not "trade or business")Notice 2020-75 silent on whether non-business pass-throughs qualify; conservative practitioners limit PTET to trade-or-business entities
Single-member LLC disregarded entityGenerally CANNOT elect PTET (not a partnership or S-corp); convert to partnership or S-corp first if PTET desired
Publicly traded partnershipGenerally NOT eligible

OBBBA Interaction - Why PTET Still Matters at $40K Cap

Federal MAGIOBBBA SALT CapPTET Value
Below $500K$40,000 cap availablePTET still useful if state income tax + property tax exceed $40K; preserves full federal deduction
$500K - $600K (phaseout zone)$40K phasing down to $10K floor at 30% ratePTET very valuable - cap phasing out; entity-level deduction bypasses
Above $600K$10K floor onlyPTET essential for high earners - $10K cap minimal; PTET bypasses cap entirely
Above $1M$10K floor; AMT phaseout also kicks in (2026 joint reset)PTET essential; also helps with AMT - SALT not deductible for AMT either
2030+ (post-OBBBA sunset)Reverts to $10K cap permanently unless Congress actsPTET permanently valuable for all high earners

S-Corp Single Class of Stock - §1361(b)(1)(D) Concern

S-corporations must have a single class of stock under §1361(b)(1)(D). PTET payments and credit allocations that do not track share ownership PROPORTIONALLY could threaten S-corp status by creating differential economic rights among shareholders.

S-Corp PTET RiskMitigation
PTET allocation not pro-rata with ownershipVerify all PTET allocations track exact share ownership percentages
Some shareholders are NY residents, others not - differential credit accessMost states address through residency-based allocation formulas; document carefully
Shareholder agreement modificationAvoid agreement language that gives differential rights to PTET credits beyond proportionate share
State-level statutory protectionMost state PTET statutes explicitly preserve S-corp single class of stock status
Practitioner verificationConfirm PTET mechanics do not inadvertently create second class of stock

Cash Flow Impact - Real Cost of PTET

Cash Flow AspectDetail
Entity-level payment timingEntity pays state tax during the year (estimated payments + true-up); reduces entity cash
Owner-level offsetOwner sees reduced K-1 income (or receives credit) reducing their state tax due on individual return
Net cash positionRoughly neutral at owner level (same total tax paid) - the WIN is the federal deduction
Estimated payment coordinationOwner must REDUCE own state estimated payments to avoid double-paying; many practitioners miss this
Q4 timingFor calendar-year entities, Q4 estimated PTET typically due January 15 of following year; coordinate with owner's federal Q4 estimates due same day
Tax distribution clausesPartnership/S-corp agreements often have tax distribution clauses funding owner's state tax; modify to account for entity-level PTET payment

Federal Deduction Limitations to Verify

Federal Limitation CheckDetail
§163(j) business interest limitationPTET reduces business income - may impact §163(j) computation; consider ATI implications
§199A QBI deductionPTET reduces QBI - QBI deduction calculated on REDUCED business income; some loss of QBI benefit; net often still favorable
§461(l) excess business lossPTET payment reduces business income for §461(l) computation; in loss years, PTET deduction may push entity into greater EBL territory
Basis impactPTET payment reduces basis in partnership interest or S-corp stock - tracking required
At-risk reductionPTET payment generally not affecting at-risk amount directly; basis tracking required separately
NOL interactionPTET in loss years contributes to entity-level loss; flows through K-1 as part of business loss

Tax Cuts and Jobs Act Sunset Provisions in State Statutes

Many state PTET statutes contain sunset clauses originally tied to the federal SALT cap's TCJA-era 2025 expiration. With OBBBA preserving the federal cap (now $40K), states are extending or making PTET permanent:

State Sunset Status2025-2026 Action
IllinoisMade PERMANENT December 12, 2025 - removed sunset
CaliforniaExtended through 2030 (was sunsetting 2025)
VirginiaExtended to 1/1/2027 (one-year incremental)
ConnecticutConverted mandatory to elective in 2024
NYS, NJ, MA, MD, GA, MN, othersGenerally extended or no immediate sunset risk
Continuing to monitorState-by-state legislative tracking required; PTET landscape continues to evolve

Common Practitioner Errors

Missing State-Specific Election Deadlines

NY March 15 deadline FALLS BEFORE entity year-end financial results are available - practitioner must estimate. California June 15 mandatory prepayment is binary - miss it and election void (2025 still under strict rule). Missing election deadline is the #1 PTET error.

Treating PTET as Optional for All Owners

PTET election is at ENTITY level. Once entity elects, ALL owners' shares are affected. Owner who would not benefit (e.g., low-income, doesn't itemize) cannot opt out at owner level. Election decision requires modeling for ALL owners.

Double-Paying State Estimated Tax

Owner who elects PTET must REDUCE own state estimated payments accordingly. Many owners continue making full personal state estimates AND entity pays PTET - resulting in overpayment, refunds, lost interest, potential complications.

Forgetting Resident State Credit Mechanics

Cross-border resident: PTET paid to State A by entity - resident State B credit varies. Some states give credit; others do not. Resident may face DOUBLE state taxation if home state denies credit. Model state-of-residence treatment before electing.

Failing to Adjust K-1 Income for PTET

Practitioners using prior-year K-1 templates may show full business income without PTET reduction. Tax software must be configured to reduce non-separately stated income by PTET payment under credit OR reduced-income model (depending on state).

Single Class of Stock Issue Ignored

Disproportionate PTET allocation among S-corp shareholders (e.g., due to differential state residency) could threaten S-corp status. Most state statutes carve this out; verify state-specific safe harbor; document allocations.

Disregarded Entity PTET Mistake

Single-member LLCs (disregarded for federal tax) generally cannot elect PTET (not a partnership or S-corp). Convert to multi-member LLC or check S-corp box BEFORE attempting PTET election.

Investment Partnership PTET Aggression

Notice 2020-75 is unclear on non-trade-or-business investment partnerships (e.g., pure investment hedge funds without §162 trade or business). Conservative practitioners limit PTET to clear trade-or-business entities. Aggressive position vulnerable to IRS challenge.

Tiered Partnership Complexity

Multi-tier partnerships (e.g., real estate operating partnership owned by master holding partnership) require careful PTET coordination. Notice 2020-75 silent on tiered structures. Conservative approach: elect at lowest tier; track basis carefully.

Forgetting §199A QBI Reduction

PTET reduces business income, which reduces QBI subject to §199A deduction. Some QBI benefit lost. Practitioner should model net effect (federal SALT savings vs lost QBI deduction); generally PTET still wins for high earners.

Ignoring Tax Distribution Clauses

Partnership/S-corp agreements often require entity to distribute cash to owners equal to estimated state tax owed. With entity now paying state tax directly via PTET, double cash outflow occurs. Modify agreements to coordinate.

Missing 2026 State Threshold Updates

States are updating PTET statutes post-OBBBA. Connecticut converted to elective (was mandatory). Illinois made permanent. California extended through 2030. Practitioners using 2024 state law may miss new election windows or sunset extensions.

Underestimating PTET for Nonresident Owners

Nonresident owner of multi-state entity may face composite return obligations, withholding requirements, and unclear home-state credit. Some nonresident owners receive NO federal benefit from PTET (already at $40K cap) while bearing administrative burden.

Treating PTET as Risk-Free Free Money

PTET requires careful coordination of state estimated payments, basis tracking, agreement amendments, multi-state compliance, and federal optimization (QBI, §163(j), §461(l), AMT). Not "set-and-forget." Annual review required.

Failing to Consider Cure Provisions

California 2026-2030 cure provision allows valid election even if June 15 missed - but 2025 missed deadline = no election. Year-by-year rules require verification.

Composite Return vs PTET Confusion

Composite returns (entity files state return on behalf of nonresident owners) are DIFFERENT from PTET. Composite returns address state filing convenience; PTET addresses federal SALT cap. Some states allow both; some restrict. Distinguish before electing.

Primary authority: IRS Notice 2020-75 (November 9, 2020 - federal blessing of pass-through entity tax workaround; state income taxes paid by partnership or S-corporation are deductible by the entity under §162 in computing non-separately stated income or loss; "specified income tax payment" defined; effective for specified income tax payments paid on or after November 9, 2020 and to specified income tax payments made before that date in tax years ending after December 31, 2017, if a return was not filed before November 9, 2020). IRC §162 (Trade or business expenses - entity-level state tax deductible as ordinary and necessary business expense). §164 (State and local taxes - general deductibility). §164(b)(6) (SALT cap - $10,000 under TCJA; $40,000 under OBBBA for 2025-2029; MAGI phaseout begins $500K/$250K MFS; floor $10,000; reverts $10K in 2030). §164(b)(6)(B) (MAGI phaseout mechanics). §164(b)(6)(C) (5% top-bracket haircut). §1361(b)(1)(D) (S-corporation single class of stock requirement; PTET allocations must track ownership). §1366 (S-corp pass-through of income and deductions; basis tracking). §1367 (S-corp stock basis adjustments). §704 (partnership distributive share). §704(d) (partnership basis limitation). §163(j) (business interest limitation - EBITDA ATI permanent under OBBBA; PTET reduces business income affecting ATI). §199A (QBI deduction - PTET reduces qualified business income). §461(l) (excess business loss - OBBBA permanent; PTET in loss years contributes to EBL computation). §55-§59 (Alternative Minimum Tax - SALT not deductible for AMT; PTET also provides AMT benefit since not SALT). §56(b)(1)(A)(ii) (SALT add-back for AMT). One Big Beautiful Bill Act, P.L. 119-21, signed July 4, 2025. OBBBA §70120 (modified §164(b)(6) - $40K cap with $500K MAGI phaseout; PRESERVED PTET workaround without modification; earlier House proposal to limit PTET was rejected in final law). State PTET statutes - approximately 36 states plus New York City have enacted; key states: Connecticut (P.A. 18-49 - first state PTET 2018, converted to elective 2024); New York (NY Tax Law §860-866, NYS PTET); New York City (NYC PTET layered on NYS); California (Revenue and Taxation Code §17052.10 / §19900 - extended through 2030, mandatory June 15 prepayment, cure provisions 2026-2030); New Jersey (Business Alternative Income Tax - BAIT); Illinois (35 ILCS 5/201 - made permanent December 12, 2025); Massachusetts; Michigan (Act 135 of 2021 - 9-month deadline extension for 2024+, 3-year binding); Virginia (Code of Virginia §58.1-390 - extended to 1/1/2027); Oklahoma (Pass-Through Entity Tax Equity Act - Form 586 stand-alone). Form 1065 (partnership return). Form 1120-S (S-corp return). State-specific PTET forms (NYS PTET, CA Form 3804, etc.). Treasury Decision pending (proposed regulations on Notice 2020-75 framework have not yet been issued as of 2026).

tk.cpa AI Lab
Nothing on this page constitutes legal, tax, accounting, or professional advice, and no professional relationship is created by your use of this website. CPA Validated is an educational website for information purposes only. Information should be verified against current primary authority, including the Internal Revenue Code, Treasury regulations, IRS guidance, and applicable state or local law, before being relied upon or acted on. Calculator outputs are estimates only and may be incomplete or inaccurate depending on the facts, assumptions, and inputs used. CPA Inc. and tk.cpa disclaim liability to the fullest extent permitted by law. Full disclaimer: cpavalidated.com/disclaimer.html